Couple's battle continues over wind turbine noise PDF Print E-mail

The following press release is relevant to Westfield Lane because we will have houses 500m from the turbines, much closer than the people in this article. 

 

Published Date: Wind turbine
29 April 2008

Lincolnshire Free Press

spaldingtoday.co.uk

By This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

It's back to square one, but a step in the right direction, for a couple who are fighting to save their home from the blight of wind turbines.

Jane and Julian Davis left their Deeping St Nicholas home at Christmas 2006 after months of sleepless nights due to noise and vibration from the turbines, which are less than 1km from their house.

However, there is a way forward at last after complaints to the Local Government Ombudsman over the handling of their issue by South Holland District Council, and monitoring of noise levels will now take place once more to establish the extent of the issue.

Mrs Davis said: "Now we start all over again - but at last it is being accepted there are issues.

"They can't take the windfarm away now, but it is a step in the right direction. We would just like to be in a position where we can go home."

Mr and Mrs Davis believe the council has refused to take enforcement action relating to a planning condition which should limit the noise from the Deeping St Nicholas windfarm, and claim monitoring by the council in October 2007, which concluded there was no problem, is invalid because the turbines were only operating at a third of their capacity.

The condition was imposed by a planning inspector, and now must be investigated by the Parliamentary Ombudsman.

But Mr and Mrs Davis believe the basis of measurement for wind turbine noise against background noise, guidance known as ETSU-97, is flawed, and the ombudsman agreed it was open to interpretation.

Mrs Davis said: "What councils are finding is that it is very difficult to measure wind turbine noise using ETSU-97

"The criterion doesn't work. It doesn't protect people and the Government needs to look at it again.

"It is good for people in the long term, because the Government will have to look at it again."

BERR (Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) is looking into the problem.



The full article contains 340 words and appears in Lincolnshire Free Press newspaper.

Page 1 of 1

 

  • Last Updated: 28 April 2008 12:48 PM
  • Source: Lincolnshire Free Press
  • Location: Spalding
 
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
Main Menu
Home
News items
P.W.A.G's response document
Objection case
Video of proposed site
Video of test mast
Official map of proposed site
Library - photo gallery!
Wind turbine horror stories
What the Politicians say
What is the PWAG?
Your local PWAG contacts
What can I do?
How to object to the wind farm
Standard letters
WMDC Planning Committee
Technical information
PWAG Newsletter etc
Events
Walk in Robin Hood's footsteps
Who are Banks Developments?
Useful links
Search
Contact Us